|
|
|
13.11.2014
05:43:01 |
Accelerator |
|
| I agree with Rollo and Sue. To take up Rik's 'failing marriage'<a href="http://geqtefhgniq.com"> alnaogy</a>, we are way beyond the stage where counselling will do any good; it's 'lawyers at dawn' time.A block of 'United States of Europe' enthusiasts want ever further integration. The UK and others want to go in the opposite direction and obtain far, far less involvement in their country's affairs by unelected bureaucrats and revert to the basic Common Market that the UK voters (including me) thought a good idea in 1975. It won't work in the long term to have a confusing mix of some states in this agreement and others in that agreement, any more than it would work having one's ex wife and children living in the same home as one's new partner. Everybody would be pulling in different directions.Let those states who's people really want more integration (note; not who's politicians want it but who's people show they want it after proper democratic procedures) join together more closely and let the others obtain their full sovereignty back prior to the agreement of more traditional trade agreements.The continual use of 'sticky tape and glue' diplomacy plus copious amounts of money from Germany, UK, etc., will not hold the EU together any better than it is at the moment and right now, it's falling apart.A serious dose of realism is required all round. |
| |
30.08.2009
20:44:20 |
Otmar st. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
